FAQ

Which NDT method is best?

There is no single best method — the right choice depends on the material, suspected defect, orientation, surface condition, access, required sensitivity and acceptance criteria. UT may suit internal flaws or thickness; ECT and MPI suit different surface or near-surface applications; PT reveals surface-breaking indications on suitable clean, non-porous materials.

Answer

There is no single best method — the right choice depends on the material, suspected defect, orientation, surface condition, access, required sensitivity and acceptance criteria. UT may suit internal flaws or thickness; ECT and MPI suit different surface or near-surface applications; PT reveals surface-breaking indications on suitable clean, non-porous materials.

Methods may be combined, and every result has a stated scope and limitations. Selection should be agreed with the applicable procedure or responsible engineer where the result affects acceptance or continued operation.

Frequently Asked Questions

There is no single best method — the right choice depends on the material, suspected defect, orientation, surface condition, access, required sensitivity and acceptance criteria. UT may suit internal flaws or thickness; ECT and MPI suit different surface or near-surface applications; PT reveals surface-breaking indications on suitable clean, non-porous materials. Methods may be combined, and every result has a stated scope and limitations. Selection should be agreed with the applicable procedure or responsible engineer where the result affects acceptance or continued operation.

Related Services

Explore complementary inspection scopes. Method, specialist partner and availability are confirmed for the asset and location.